Transformation

Ali Al Mokdad
Strategic Senior Leader
2025 confirmed two truths at the same time. It exposed, again, how deep the aid industrial complex can be, with incentives that reward process, branding, and control more than outcomes. And it also confirmed something else: the resilience that lives in people, and the quiet humanity that keeps showing up as a principle, not a slogan. In the middle of mixed signals and hard trade offs, adaptation remained the backbone, the skill that turns uncertainty into forward impactful motion.
Above all, 2025 taught me that our problems are human made, and they can be solved by humans. Systems are people. When we treat governance as a technical exercise instead of an ethical one, we produce fear, silence, and compliance, then call it performance. When we lead with clarity and courage, trust returns. I witnessed that among the leaders I collaborated with, especially those leading local organizations and volunteer teams.
The biggest positive shift in 2026 would be to move from aid as a permanent operating model toward aid that unlocks trade, jobs, and local systems, while keeping principled humanitarian support where needs are acute. Practically, that means testing innovative funding models: pooled funds, private sector partnerships, impact investment, and faster direct allocations to local responders, including peer to peer diaspora support through crypto and cash transfers, with clear safeguards and accountability. It also means adopting cash first and anticipatory approaches as the default and encouraging smaller organizations to build social enterprise pathways that reduce dependency over time.
At the same time, the need for stronger and wider voices for localized interventions, and serious investment in ethical AI adoption: training, policies, and governance, so technology strengthens trust instead of creating new risks.
Finally, as migration conditionality is likely to rise, it becomes even more important to keep humanitarian action anchored in community defined needs, rights, and dignity. Assistance should remain guided by impartiality and by what people themselves identify as urgent, safe, and necessary.